A year after her murder, the police re-open the case of Yvonne Harrison when they receive an anonymous letter implicating a burglar, Harry Repp, who is about to be released from prison. Supt. Strange assigns the case to DS Lewis, who is chafing at the bit awaiting his promotion to Inspector. Morse has been ill and has only just returned to work. He steps on Lewis' toes by involving himself in the case, but as the body count rises, Morse finds himself in charge of investigating a woman who had many affairs with many different men. When he learns that the dead men were in possession of large amount of cash, he suspects they were blackmailing her murderer.

　　Rachel James is shot through her kitchen window while having breakfast early one morning. She was having an affair with Dr. Julian Storrs, an Oxford professor who is a candidate for Master of Lonsdale College. When her next door neighbor is also killed however, Morse determines that the shooting of James may have been in error. Morse also suspects that he may have been a blackmailer. Both Storrs an his rival for the Masters position, Denis Cornford had secrets that would make them suspects. Morse determines that several others also had things to hide and any one of them could have committed the murders.

　　Morse is taken seriously ill at a museum reception and is hospitalized. In the hospital, Supt. Strange, visits Morse to push him to take early retirement, while Dr. Millicent 'Millie' Van Buren gives him her book on a 140 year-old court case known as the Oxford Canal Murders. The case involved the murder and rape of a young woman, Mrs Joanna Franks, traveling by canal boat from Coventry to London. The case resulted in three boatmen being sentenced to death and two of them hanged. Morse starts to read Millie's book and dreams about it. He soon has a number of problems with the case.
　　Why weren't the three men also charged with theft? Why did Mrs Franks take a boat instead of a train that was much faster and comfortable and only slightly more expensive? Why didn't she abandon the boat after she complained about lewd behavior of the crew at the shipping office in Banbury? Why did she then drink and 'socialise' with the crew? What happened to her 'carpet bag' with which she arrived on the boat but which was not mentioned in the court case, nor was it stored in the archives with her, almost empty, trunk? The trunk was marked with initials of her first husband who had died. How did it happen that her shoes were found on the boat but nobody saw her return to the boat from the forest?
　　PC Adrian Kershaw does some brilliant leg work for Morse. He studied history and has invaluable background knowledge. For instance, he mentions that the boatmen had bad reputation because they worked on Sundays and did not attend church. Later a chapel was built for them in Oxford.
　　The dead woman's clothes and the shoes found on the boat are submitted to modern forensic investigation. The result is that the shoes did not belong to the dead woman found in the water because she was much taller.The shoes were never used in the forest.
　　Only Mrs Franks' husband, Charles Franks, was called to identify the body of the dead woman. He claimed that, while her face was darkened and disfigured, he found a birth mark behind her ear. The prosecutor welcomed that information "that only a husband or a lover would know". The accused were not shown the body. The defense attorney merely claimed that the guilt of the three men was not proved. All three accused claimed to the end that they were innocent. One of them was not executed because he embraced Christianity in prison.
　　Morse instructs Kershaw to investigate if Charles Franks benefited from his wife's death and, indeed, he pocketed 300 pounds insurance money. Case closed: Charles Franks murdered a tall women and dropped her in the canal after meeting Joanna in the forest. If Joanna Franks jumped off the boat at the same time as the dead body hit the water, she swam to the bank and joined her husband. The couple changed their names, in the case of 'Charles Franks' a second time after he 'died' as Joanna's first husband. The fourth boatman, a youngster who was not charged, was probably paid by Joanna to give false testimony.
　　Morse travels to Ireland and has a grave of Joanna's first husband exhumed. The coffin contains bags of sand and some stones.

　　萊安農(nóng)·劉易斯 (Rhiannon Lewis) 并不令人印象深刻，也很難脫穎而出。她走在街上時(shí)，人們不會(huì)注意到她。她在工作中升職時(shí)總是被忽視，她喜歡的那個(gè)男人有承諾問(wèn)題，她的父親病得很重。突然間，當(dāng)她失去控制并變成一個(gè)全新的人時(shí)，她生活中的一切都發(fā)生了巨大變化——一個(gè)有信心做任何事情的人。當(dāng)她擁抱一個(gè)新的強(qiáng)大角色時(shí)，她的生活永遠(yuǎn)改變了，但她能保守自己的秘密嗎？
　　該劇改編自 C.J.斯庫(kù)斯 2017 年的同名邪典小說(shuō)

　　夏明翰年輕時(shí)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的革命團(tuán)體“沙子會(huì)”在當(dāng)?shù)睾苡杏绊?。面?duì)吳佩孚的招安，他不屑一顧；在查禁日貨的斗爭(zhēng)中，他大義滅親。這些舉動(dòng)引來(lái)富紳們的強(qiáng)烈不滿(mǎn)。夏明翰的爺爺為保他安全，將他深鎖閣樓。夏明翰趁夜破窗逃走，從此與家庭決裂。到長(zhǎng)沙后，夏明翰經(jīng)毛澤東介紹加入共產(chǎn)黨。在領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人力車(chē)工人罷工時(shí)，交通員鄭家鈞為掩護(hù)他，右臂中彈受傷。兩人在接觸中日久生情，經(jīng)毛澤東提議，結(jié)為夫婦。1928年，夏明翰被黨調(diào)至湖北工作。此時(shí)，白色恐怖愈演愈烈，國(guó)民黨幾次抓捕夏明翰未果。夏明翰與中央派來(lái)的李維漢商議決定取消暴動(dòng)計(jì)劃，卻在準(zhǔn)備轉(zhuǎn)移時(shí)不幸被內(nèi)奸出賣(mài)。英勇就義前，夏明翰留下了愛(ài)國(guó)詩(shī)：“砍頭不要緊，只要主義真。殺了夏明翰，還有后來(lái)人”。

　　講述來(lái)民國(guó)初年，在風(fēng)云際會(huì)的上海灘，一個(gè)平凡的小警察邢佳棟飾演的陸行天被推到來(lái)時(shí)代的風(fēng)口浪尖，繼而發(fā)生的種種感情、革命、斗爭(zhēng)故事。該劇有個(gè)特別之處就是引進(jìn)了一個(gè)全新的行當(dāng)-翻戲黨，導(dǎo)演譚友業(yè)表示，該劇故事將鏡頭對(duì)準(zhǔn)縱橫江湖數(shù)百年傳奇行當(dāng)雁門(mén)，民國(guó)時(shí)期又名“翻戲黨”，“這一門(mén)算是江湖中上的地下黨，專(zhuān)以詐術(shù)、設(shè)局騙取金銀財(cái)寶，他們這些人是江湖幾大門(mén)最有智商和謀略，專(zhuān)干大買(mǎi)賣(mài)?！?/p>

　　《刷新3+7》由10個(gè)獨(dú)立的故事組成。刷新：告別過(guò)去重新開(kāi)始。3，過(guò)去現(xiàn)在未來(lái)3種時(shí)態(tài)；7，7種顏色，多彩的生命。
　　10個(gè)故事分別為：
　　《說(shuō)好我們的店》
　　
　　《城市之光》
　　
　　《小城故事多》
　　
　　《喜宴》
　　
　　《六月的雨》
　　
　　《墻里墻外》
　　
　　《我的居委會(huì)大媽》
　　
　　《彩色星期五》
　　
　　《兵馬俑與招財(cái)貓》
　　《藝術(shù)家》

　　該劇以劉集支部保存的我國(guó)現(xiàn)存最早中文譯本《共產(chǎn)黨宣言》為主題，是東營(yíng)市實(shí)施的一項(xiàng)重點(diǎn)文化工程，是一部向中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨90華誕紀(jì)念而創(chuàng)作的主旋律獻(xiàn)禮劇。

 孟波(連偉健)受黑幫長(zhǎng)老之托，保護(hù)其女，引致好友被殺，但波仍繼續(xù)向黑幫挑戰(zhàn)，并以熱誠(chéng)感化江湖中人改邪歸正，可是危機(jī)四伏，波終被國(guó)際恐怖殺手組織追殺。這二十集新派動(dòng)作劇，分四個(gè)有連貫性之故事，主要環(huán)繞這位終日周旋于美女群中的偵探孟波，全劇輕松惹笑，故事緊湊剌激，是觀眾必然選擇.

 皇帝還是如往常一樣不上朝，龍椅上不見(jiàn)龍顏，文武百官只能望龍椅遙拜，朝中大事就由崔丞相和秦公公代行視事。二皇爺感嘆皇帝終日在深宮沈浸酒色，不理朝政，坐視佞臣把持政務(wù)。 皇帝在後宮夜夜笙歌，沈湎於酒池肉林中，白蓮教主顧允成一心推翻昏君，派出得力弟子錢(qián)一本和女兒顧芙蓉行刺狗皇帝。 兩人蒙面夜闖寢宮行刺昏庸無(wú)能的皇帝，夜裡傳來(lái)皇帝的驚叫…大事不好，出事啦～ 秦公公、崔丞相偷讀皇上如有不虞時(shí)的遺詔，竟指名要皇上寵幸的愛(ài)妃鄭貴妃、苗貴妃、及近臣秦公公、崔丞相、劉大學(xué)士與張校尉陪葬，劉大學(xué)士與張校尉皆為文武忠臣，自然願(yuàn)意慷慨隨伴皇上共赴黃泉。但貪生怕死的皇后，與一直戀棧權(quán)位的大太監(jiān)秦公公、大貪官崔丞相哪肯陪葬，三人商量出一個(gè)權(quán)宜之計(jì)，就是到民間找一個(gè)長(zhǎng)相跟皇上相似的人進(jìn)宮，假扮皇上。此舉一來(lái)他們可免除陪葬厄運(yùn)，二來(lái)又可「挾天子以令諸侯」，控制假皇帝！ 皇宮高牆內(nèi)有個(gè)皇帝躺在冰冷的地下室昏迷著，高牆外的市集內(nèi)卻有個(gè)長(zhǎng)的和皇帝一模一樣的人在活蹦亂跳著。他是何天養(yǎng)，一樣的臉孔，卻有著天壤之別的人生。 究竟乞丐何天養(yǎng)與皇帝有何關(guān)係？在他認(rèn)識(shí)了窮書(shū)生李尚文和賣(mài)身葬父的江湖女子顏小栗後，會(huì)如何展開(kāi)他們一連串前所未有的冒險(xiǎn)旅程…